In my last article on this site “What is Smartgeometry and where should it go? (part 1)” I promised to give some of my views what SmartGeometry has achieved so far, what we are currently exploring and where interesting fields for the future might lie. The first I’ll cover in this article, the last two will be covered in the next parts of this series.

If you are on LinkedIn, SmartGeometry is too!

Find it here:

http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=891377&trk=hb_side_g

Recently, I have been involved in various discussions with core members of SmartGeometry about what exactly SmartGeometry is, what it should be and where it should be going. In this blog article I’ll try to explain what my point of view currently is and hopefully this will contribute to discussion about where we should go and, concerning the contents, what the next step is for the architecture, engineering and everything which relates to it.